Be In, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al
Filing
16
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Google Inc., Richard Robinson. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bal, Colleen) (Filed on 9/4/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637
CHARLES TAIT GRAVES, State Bar No. 197923
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
One Market Plaza
Spear Tower, Suite 3300
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Phone (415) 947-2000
Fax (415) 947-2099
tgraves@wsgr.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Google Inc. and Richard Robinson
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
BE IN, INC., a New York Corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
GOOGLE INC., a California corporation;
)
RICHARD ROBINSON, an individual, and Does )
1 through 3 inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOTION
TO SEAL
CASE NO.: 5:12-CV-03373-LHK
Case No.: 5:12-cv-3373-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
STIPULATD MOTION TO SEAL
Hearing Date: January 3, 2013
Hearing Time: 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom: 8, 4th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
ORDER ON MOTION TO SEAL
On September 4, 2012, Defendant Google Inc. and Plaintiff Be In, Inc. filed a stipulated
administrative motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) to seal Exhibit B to the Declaration
of Charles Graves. The Court has considered the parties’ stipulated submission.
The Court finds good cause for the motion to seal. Accordingly, the stipulated motion to
seal is GRANTED.
All copies of Exhibit B to the September 4, 2012 Declaration of Charles Graves shall be
sealed in its entirety for the remainder of this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
, 2012.
13
14
THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOTION
TO SEAL
CASE NO.: 5:12-CV-03373-LHK
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?