Su v. Siemens Industry, Inc.

Filing 141

ORDER CLARIFYING OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEF DEADLINES re 138 Renotice motion hearing; 139 Correction of Opposition/Response or Reply Deadlines, filed by Julie Su. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 6, 2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JULIE SU, Case No. 12-cv-03743-JST Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER CLARIFYING OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEF DEADLINES 9 10 SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., Re: ECF Nos. 138 & 139 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 On May 27, Plaintiff filed a motion to shorten time, and a motion for clarification, and 12 13 noticed the hearing on the motion for clarification for June 19, in violation of Civil Local Rule 7- 14 2(a). ECF No. 129. The court denied the motion to shorten time, and ordered Plaintiff to re- 15 notice the motion for clarification consistent with Civil Local Rule 7-2(a). ECF No. 137. Plaintiff then re-noticed the motion for clarification for hearing on July 10, consistent with 16 17 Civil Local Rule 7-2(a), and listed the deadline for opposition as June 10, and the deadline for 18 replies as June 17. ECF No. 138. Then, Plaintiff “corrected” the notice to state that the deadline 19 for opposition is June 18, and the deadline for replies is June 25. ECF No. 139. Plaintiff had the opposition and reply brief deadlines correct the first time. “The 20 21 opposition must be filed and served not more than 14 days after the motion was filed.” Civ. L.R. 22 7-3(a). Plaintiff’s motion for clarification was filed on May 27, and so any opposition brief must 23 be filed by June 10. Any reply brief is due June 17. Civ. L. R. 7-3(c). The fact that Plaintiff re- 24 noticed the hearing for a later date does not change the briefing deadlines, which are calculated 25 from the date the motion is filed. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 The parties may submit a stipulation or a motion to alter the briefing deadlines, but until the court issues an order changing the deadlines, the Local Rules apply. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 6, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?