Su v. Siemens Industry, Inc.

Filing 141

ORDER CLARIFYING OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEF DEADLINES re 138 Renotice motion hearing; 139 Correction of Opposition/Response or Reply Deadlines, filed by Julie Su. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 6, 2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JULIE SU,

Case No. 12-cv-03743-JST
Plaintiff,

8
v.

ORDER CLARIFYING OPPOSITION
AND REPLY BRIEF DEADLINES

9
10

SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.,

Re: ECF Nos. 138 & 139

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
On May 27, Plaintiff filed a motion to shorten time, and a motion for clarification, and

12
13

noticed the hearing on the motion for clarification for June 19, in violation of Civil Local Rule 7-

14

2(a). ECF No. 129. The court denied the motion to shorten time, and ordered Plaintiff to re-

15

notice the motion for clarification consistent with Civil Local Rule 7-2(a). ECF No. 137.
Plaintiff then re-noticed the motion for clarification for hearing on July 10, consistent with

16
17

Civil Local Rule 7-2(a), and listed the deadline for opposition as June 10, and the deadline for

18

replies as June 17. ECF No. 138. Then, Plaintiff “corrected” the notice to state that the deadline

19

for opposition is June 18, and the deadline for replies is June 25. ECF No. 139.
Plaintiff had the opposition and reply brief deadlines correct the first time. “The

20
21

opposition must be filed and served not more than 14 days after the motion was filed.” Civ. L.R.

22

7-3(a). Plaintiff’s motion for clarification was filed on May 27, and so any opposition brief must

23

be filed by June 10. Any reply brief is due June 17. Civ. L. R. 7-3(c). The fact that Plaintiff re-

24

noticed the hearing for a later date does not change the briefing deadlines, which are calculated

25

from the date the motion is filed.

26

///

27

///

28

///

1
2
3
4
5
6

The parties may submit a stipulation or a motion to alter the briefing deadlines, but until
the court issues an order changing the deadlines, the Local Rules apply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 6, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2