Su v. Siemens Industry, Inc.
Filing
157
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME; CONTINUING STAY OF EFFECT OF PREVIOUS ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO BRING INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL re 154 Second MOTION for Leave to Appeal filed by Julie Su. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 5, 2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JULIE SU,
Case No. 12-cv-03743-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.,
Defendant.
11
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME; CONTINUING STAY
OF EFFECT OF PREVIOUS ORDER
GRANTING LEAVE TO BRING
INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Re: ECF No. 154
12
The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for an order shortening Defendant's time to oppose
13
Plaintiff’s motion to seek interlocutory appeal. Plaintiff’s efforts to seek a stipulation, Civil Local
14
Rule 6-3(a)(2), were insufficient. Moreover, Plaintiff has not identified any “substantial harm or
15
prejudice that would occur if the Court did not change the time.” Civ. L.R. 6-3(a)(3).
16
The stay of this action remains in effect. The court also further STAYS the effect of its
17
previous order granting Plaintiff leave to seek interlocutory appeal. That order will now take effect
18
ten days after the Court issues an order on Plaintiff’s current, and final, motion for interlocutory
19
appeal.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: August 5, 2014
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?