Medina v. Mendocino County et al

Filing 11

ORDER REOPENING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/9/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-Filed 6/9/14* 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 PORFIRIO MEDINA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. C 12-3767 RS (PR) ORDER REOPENING ACTION v. THOMAS D. ALLMAN, MENDOCINO COUNTY, and 14 DOES 1–100; 13 15 Defendants. / 16 17 This federal civil rights action was dismissed in April 2013 because plaintiff failed to 18 file an amended complaint that complied with the Court’s directions. He now moves to 19 reopen the action (Docket No. 10) and has submitted a second amended complaint. The 20 motion to reopen is GRANTED. The action is REOPENED, and the Clerk is directed to 21 amend the docket accordingly. The judgment (Docket No. 8) and the order of dismissal 22 (Docket No. 7) are VACATED. The Court will review the amended complaint in a separate 23 order. The Clerk shall terminate Docket No. 10. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 9, 2014 RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 27 28 No. C 12-3767 RS (PR) ORDER REOPENING ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?