Medina v. Mendocino County et al

Filing 11

ORDER REOPENING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/9/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2014)

1
2

*E-Filed 6/9/14*

3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

PORFIRIO MEDINA,

11

Plaintiff,

12

No. C 12-3767 RS (PR)
ORDER REOPENING ACTION

v.

THOMAS D. ALLMAN,
MENDOCINO COUNTY, and
14 DOES 1–100;
13

15

Defendants.
/

16
17

This federal civil rights action was dismissed in April 2013 because plaintiff failed to

18

file an amended complaint that complied with the Court’s directions. He now moves to

19

reopen the action (Docket No. 10) and has submitted a second amended complaint. The

20

motion to reopen is GRANTED. The action is REOPENED, and the Clerk is directed to

21

amend the docket accordingly. The judgment (Docket No. 8) and the order of dismissal

22

(Docket No. 7) are VACATED. The Court will review the amended complaint in a separate

23

order. The Clerk shall terminate Docket No. 10.

24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 9, 2014
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

27
28
No. C 12-3767 RS (PR)
ORDER REOPENING ACTION