Hill v. Astrue

Filing 23

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO INFORM COURT WHETHER HE CONSENTS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. Plaintiff is directed to advise the Court, no later than April 30, 2013, as to whether he consents to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proc eedings. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 3, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/3/2013: # 1 Exhibit Form) (mmclc1, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/3/2013: # 2 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

ANTHONY J. HILL,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
INFORM COURT WHETHER HE
CONSENTS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FOR ALL PURPOSES

v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner, Social
Security Administration

16
17

No. C 12-4482 MMC

/

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to
reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final
judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). On September 28, 2012, defendant filed her consent to
proceed before a magistrate judge for all purposes.
Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than April 30,
2013, as to whether he consents to have a magistrate judge conduct all further
proceedings in the instant action. For plaintiff’s convenience, a consent form is attached
hereto; forms are also available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: April 3, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge