Chiprez v. Quezada et al

Filing 9

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/20/13. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-Filed 2/20/13* 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 15 16 ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff, 13 14 No. C 12-4694 RS (PR) JESUS CHIPREZ, v. C. QUEZADA, et al., Defendants. / 17 18 Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within 30 days. More than 30 days 19 have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the action is 20 DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s order and, under 21 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute. His motion for an extension 22 of time (Docket No. 8) is DENIED. Any motion to reopen must contain an amended 23 complaint. A blank complaint form will be sent to plaintiff. The Clerk shall terminate 24 Docket No. 8, enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file. 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 20, 2013 RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 28 No. C 12-4694 RS (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?