Chiprez v. Quezada et al

Filing 9

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/20/13. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2013)

1
2

*E-Filed 2/20/13*

3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

15
16

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. C 12-4694 RS (PR)

JESUS CHIPREZ,

v.
C. QUEZADA, et al.,
Defendants.
/

17
18

Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within 30 days. More than 30 days

19

have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the action is

20

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s order and, under

21

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute. His motion for an extension

22

of time (Docket No. 8) is DENIED. Any motion to reopen must contain an amended

23

complaint. A blank complaint form will be sent to plaintiff. The Clerk shall terminate

24

Docket No. 8, enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 20, 2013
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

28
No. C 12-4694 RS (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL