Nia v. Hedgpeth

Filing 43

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL AND SETTING NEW DEADLINES 36 40 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/19/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/19/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tfS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AASIM NIA, 8 No. C 12-4858 SI (pr) Plaintiff, v. 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 9 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL AND SETTING NEW DEADLINES A. HEDGPETH, 11 Defendant. / 12 13 Defendants have filed an ex parte motion to extend the deadlines for plaintiff to file an 14 opposition to defendants' pending motion for summary judgment and for defendants to file a 15 reply brief. In that motion, defense counsel represents that counsel conferred with plaintiff 16 regarding his discovery request, they reached an agreement regarding a document production, 17 and documents were produced that plaintiff needs time to review before filing his opposition to 18 the summary judgment motion. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to compel is DISMISSED as 19 moot (Docket # 36), and defendants' motion to extend the deadlines is GRANTED (Docket # 20 40). The court now sets the following new deadlines for defendants' summary judgment motion: 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Plaintiff must file and serve on defense counsel his opposition to the motion for summary judgment no later than June 20, 2014. 2. Defendants must file and serve on plaintiff their reply brief, if any, no later than July 11, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 19, 2014 _______________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?