Davis v. Lewis et al

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING CASE for failure to respond to the Court's order and for failure to prosecute. This dismissal is without prejudice, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/16/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13

No. C 12-5124 RS (PR)

CHATETON DAVIS,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.
G.D. LEWIS, et al.,
Defendants.
/

17
18

Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint by the Court’s deadline.

19

Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED for failure to respond to the

20

Court’s order and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

21

This dismissal is without prejudice. Any motion to reopen must contain an amended

22

complaint. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
DATED: April___, 2013

RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

26
27
28
No. C 12-5124 RS (PR)
JUDGMENT