Hadera v. Astrue

Filing 4

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM THE COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSE. (Due: 11/28/12). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/7/12. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix)(bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 GEBREMEDHIN HADERA, 7 8 9 Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM THE COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES Defendant. ___________________________________/ 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C12-5315 EMC 12 13 In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to 14 reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. 15 See Civil L.R. 73-19(b). 16 Accordingly, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than November 17 28, 2012, as to whether they consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in 18 the instant action. For the parties' convenience, a consent form is attached hereto; forms are also 19 available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the "Forms" section. The parties are further advised 20 that they may jointly request assignment to a special magistrate judge. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 7, 2012 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?