Lahiji v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA et al
Filing
16
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/14/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
AMIR LAHIJI,
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
No. C 12-05473 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA;
CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY;
FIDELITY CAPITAL FUNDING, INC.; JP
MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; BANK OF
AMERICA, NA; and FEDERAL DEPOSIT
INSURANCE CORPORATION;
Defendants.
/
15
16
On December 5, defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation filed a motion to
17
dismiss the complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition to the motion was due
18
December 19. No opposition or response has been received. Plaintiff, who is represented by
19
counsel, failed to respond to two orders to show cause requiring plaintiff to respond to the
20
motion to dismiss. Plaintiff was repeatedly warned that failure to timely respond to the Court’s
21
orders to show cause may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. The second order to show
22
cause further stated that it was plaintiff’s final warning. The deadline for responding to the
23
second order to show cause has come and gone, and no response has been received. The action
24
is hereby DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Judgment will be entered by separate order.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: January 14, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?