Lahiji v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA et al

Filing 16

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/14/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3
4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7

AMIR LAHIJI,

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

No. C 12-05473 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA;
CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY;
FIDELITY CAPITAL FUNDING, INC.; JP
MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; BANK OF
AMERICA, NA; and FEDERAL DEPOSIT
INSURANCE CORPORATION;
Defendants.
/

15
16

On December 5, defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation filed a motion to

17

dismiss the complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition to the motion was due

18

December 19. No opposition or response has been received. Plaintiff, who is represented by

19

counsel, failed to respond to two orders to show cause requiring plaintiff to respond to the

20

motion to dismiss. Plaintiff was repeatedly warned that failure to timely respond to the Court’s

21

orders to show cause may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. The second order to show

22

cause further stated that it was plaintiff’s final warning. The deadline for responding to the

23

second order to show cause has come and gone, and no response has been received. The action

24

is hereby DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Judgment will be entered by separate order.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: January 14, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE