Lahiji v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA et al

Filing 16

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/14/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 AMIR LAHIJI, 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 No. C 12-05473 WHA Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA; CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY; FIDELITY CAPITAL FUNDING, INC.; JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; BANK OF AMERICA, NA; and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION; Defendants. / 15 16 On December 5, defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation filed a motion to 17 dismiss the complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition to the motion was due 18 December 19. No opposition or response has been received. Plaintiff, who is represented by 19 counsel, failed to respond to two orders to show cause requiring plaintiff to respond to the 20 motion to dismiss. Plaintiff was repeatedly warned that failure to timely respond to the Court’s 21 orders to show cause may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. The second order to show 22 cause further stated that it was plaintiff’s final warning. The deadline for responding to the 23 second order to show cause has come and gone, and no response has been received. The action 24 is hereby DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Judgment will be entered by separate order. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: January 14, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?