Lahiji v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA et al
Filing
19
NOTICE RE DOCKET NUMBER 18 re 18 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Amir Lahiji (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/13/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
AMIR LAHIJI,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 12-05473 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
NOTICE RE DOCKET NUMBER 18
17
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA;
CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE
COMPANY; FIDELITY CAPITAL
FUNDING, INC.; JP MORGAN
CHASE BANK, NA; BANK OF
AMERICA, NA; and FEDERAL
DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION;
18
Defendants.
14
15
16
/
19
20
21
Plaintiff Amir Lahiji failed to respond to defendant Federal Deposit Insurance
22
Corporation’s motion to dismiss the complaint, despite two orders to show cause requiring him
23
to do so. Plaintiff was repeatedly warned that failure to timely respond to the orders to show
24
cause could result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. Due to plaintiff’s complete lack of
25
response to the motion to dismiss and this Court’s orders, the action was dismissed for failure to
26
prosecute. Accordingly, an order dismissing the action was filed on January 14, 2013. Judgment
27
was entered against plaintiff by separate order filed the same day.
28
1
On February 1, over two weeks after the dismissal order and judgment were filed,
2
plaintiff filed a request seeking that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The request is
3
untimely, as judgment has been entered and the Clerk has closed the file.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: February 13, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?