Lahiji v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA et al

Filing 19

NOTICE RE DOCKET NUMBER 18 re 18 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Amir Lahiji (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/13/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 AMIR LAHIJI, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 12-05473 WHA Plaintiff, v. NOTICE RE DOCKET NUMBER 18 17 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA; CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY; FIDELITY CAPITAL FUNDING, INC.; JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; BANK OF AMERICA, NA; and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION; 18 Defendants. 14 15 16 / 19 20 21 Plaintiff Amir Lahiji failed to respond to defendant Federal Deposit Insurance 22 Corporation’s motion to dismiss the complaint, despite two orders to show cause requiring him 23 to do so. Plaintiff was repeatedly warned that failure to timely respond to the orders to show 24 cause could result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. Due to plaintiff’s complete lack of 25 response to the motion to dismiss and this Court’s orders, the action was dismissed for failure to 26 prosecute. Accordingly, an order dismissing the action was filed on January 14, 2013. Judgment 27 was entered against plaintiff by separate order filed the same day. 28 1 On February 1, over two weeks after the dismissal order and judgment were filed, 2 plaintiff filed a request seeking that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The request is 3 untimely, as judgment has been entered and the Clerk has closed the file. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: February 13, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?