Lapat et al v. Miller et al

Filing 12

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION re 11 Order to Show Cause, (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
NORMA LAPAT, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

v.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

WMC MORTGAGE CORP, et al.,
Defendants.
/

15
16

No. C 12-05529 WHA

A prior order (Dkt. No. 11) required the plaintiffs to show cause why this action should

17

not be dismissed because plaintiffs’ complaint is unintelligible. Plaintiffs failed to respond to the

18

order to show cause and did not appear at the hearing. This order holds that the action shall be

19

DISMISSED for failure to respond to the order to show cause, for failure to prosecute, and for

20

filing an unintelligible complaint. The Clerk shall CLOSE THE FILE.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: January 31, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE