Lapat et al v. Miller et al

Filing 12

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION re 11 Order to Show Cause, (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 NORMA LAPAT, et al., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WMC MORTGAGE CORP, et al., Defendants. / 15 16 No. C 12-05529 WHA A prior order (Dkt. No. 11) required the plaintiffs to show cause why this action should 17 not be dismissed because plaintiffs’ complaint is unintelligible. Plaintiffs failed to respond to the 18 order to show cause and did not appear at the hearing. This order holds that the action shall be 19 DISMISSED for failure to respond to the order to show cause, for failure to prosecute, and for 20 filing an unintelligible complaint. The Clerk shall CLOSE THE FILE. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 31, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?