Ellington v. Salinas Valley State Prison

Filing 6

ORDER of Transfer. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/4/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARCUS RUBEN ELLINGTON, No. C-12-6125 EMC (pr) 8 Petitioner, 9 v. ORDER OF TRANSFER SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Respondent. ___________________________________/ 13 14 Petitioner, an inmate at the California State Prison in Lancaster, has filed a petition for writ 15 of habeas corpus to challenge the execution of his sentence, i.e., a prison disciplinary decision. 16 Although the disciplinary decision occurred while he was housed at Salinas Valley State Prison, he 17 has since been transferred to a new prison. The prison at which Petitioner is now incarcerated is in 18 Los Angeles County, within the venue of the Central District of California. Venue is proper in a 19 habeas action in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); 20 however, the district of confinement is the preferable forum to review the execution of a sentence. 21 See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Because 22 Petitioner is confined in the Central District of California and challenging the execution of his 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b), and in the interests of justice, 2 this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of 3 California. The Clerk shall transfer this matter forthwith. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: March 4, 2013 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?