Barbieri v. Freitas et al
Filing
19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER re 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Ronald James Barbieri (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/4/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
RONALD JAMES BARBIERI,
7
8
9
No. C 12-06311 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
STEVEN FREITAS, SONOMA COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, KATHRYN
STRALEY, and DOES 1-15,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR A
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
Defendants.
/
12
13
On December 21, 2012, pro se plaintiff Ronald James Barbieri filed an ex parte
14
application for a temporary restraining order to enjoin enforcement of a judgment entered against
15
him in a state court unlawful detainer action. On January 2, 2013, the action was reassigned to
16
Judge Claudia Wilken, who filed a judicial referral regarding related cases. By order dated
17
January 3, the action was reassigned to the undersigned judge as related to Case No.
18
12-cv-05252-WHA. Plaintiff’s TRO application seeks to enjoin defendants from enforcing the
19
judgment and evicting him from his home. This order notes that the “Notice to Vacate,”
20
appended as Exhibit A to the complaint, states that possession of the property must be turned
21
over by December 18, 2012, three days prior to the filing of the TRO application. It appears that
22
plaintiff has not turned over possession of the property or vacated.
23
Defendants have not filed a response to plaintiff’s TRO application. Defendants are
24
hereby ordered to show cause why the application for a TRO should not be granted. Defendants’
25
response is due by JANUARY 9 AT NOON.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: January 4, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?