Grimes v. San Mateo County Transit District et al

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING IN PART #14 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and to Strike. All of Mr. Grimes's claims against the Individual Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, and the Mr. Grimes's third claim against the District for tortious discharge in violation of public policy is DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as well. As for Mr. Grimes's first claim against the District for discrimination in violation of Title VII and his second claim against the District for harassment in violation of Title VII, the court DISMISSES them WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. His second claim against the District for retaliation in violation of Title VII SURVIVES. In addition, the court STRIKES Mr. Grimes's prayer for punitive damages against the District. Mr. Grimes shall file any First Amended Complaint no later than May 20, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/22/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/22/2013: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ls, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CARL GRIMES, Case Number: CV12-06381 LB Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on April 22, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Carl Anthony Grimes 1017 El Camino Real PMB 315 Redwood City, CA 94063 Dated: April 22, 2013 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Lashanda Scott, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?