Cohens v. Alameda County Sheriff Department
Filing
15
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's 1st Amended Complaint or in the alternative motion for more definite statement filed by Alameda County Sheriff Department, 13 MOTION to Strike EXEMPLARY DAMAGES CLAIM filed by Alameda County Sheriff Department. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 8, 2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
EDWIN J. COHENS,
Case No. 13-cv-00303-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF
DEPARTMENT,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 12 & 13
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING
12
13
Before the Court are Plaintiffs' motions to dismiss Plaintiff's first amended complaint and
14
to strike Plaintiff's exemplary damages claim. Dkt. No. 12 & 13. Pursuant to Federal Rule of
15
Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the parties’ briefs have
16
thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matter suitable for disposition without oral
17
argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for April 18, 2013, is hereby
18
VACATED.
19
However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than three days from the date
20
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
21
been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, the Court will reschedule the hearing at a
22
time that is convenient to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Any such notice should
23
reflect the date or dates on which the parties are available for the hearing.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 8, 2013
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?