Hughes v. Wells Fargo Bank

Filing 15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Show Cause Response due by 3/27/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 3/13/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12

ROSE HUGHES
Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

Case No.: 13-cv-00499 JSC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

15
16

WELLS FARGO BANK,
Defendant.

17
18
19

Now pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, filed February 8, 2013.

20

(Dkt. No. 6.) Plaintiff has not filed an Opposition or Statement of Nonopposition to the Motion to

21

Dismiss, as required by Local Rule 7-3(b). Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to

22

SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff

23

should file a response to the ORDER to SHOW CAUSE, along with a response to the Motion to

24

Dismiss, on or before March 27, 2013. If no response is received, this action may be dismissed with

25

prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute.

26
27
28

In addition, the Court hereby VACATES the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss set for March
21, 2013.

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

Dated: March 13, 2013
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2