Shin et al v. NDEX West LLC et al
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS re 16 Renotice motion hearing, filed by Wachovia Mortgage, 6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Wachovia Mortgage (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/20/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
YONG T. SHIN AND SANG EUN SHIN,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
MOTION TO DISMISS
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR
BY MERGER TO WELLS FARGO BANK
SOUTHWEST, N.A. F/K/A WACHOVIA
MORTGAGE, FSB FKA WORLD SAVINGS
BANK, FSB AND NDEX WEST, LLC ,
No. C 13-00579 WHA
On February 14, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3,
plaintiffs’ opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto was due by March 4. None was
received. On March 5, an order issued relating this case to Shin v. Wells Fargo Bank, et al., No.
12-01561-WHA and the action was reassigned to the undersigned judge. Defendants have
renoticed the motion for hearing on May 2. Accordingly, the following briefing schedule is
hereby set: plaintiffs’ response to the motion to dismiss is due by APRIL 2. The reply is due
For the benefit of plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se, the parties are on notice that
failure to timely respond to the motion to dismiss may result in the motion being granted or the
action being dismissed for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 19, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?