Caovilla et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 8/2/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14

DAWNEEN PARDINI CAOVILLA;
DAVID CAOVILLA,
Plaintiffs,

15
16

Case No.: 13-cv-1003 JSC
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v.

17
18
19

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

20
21

On July 19, 2013, the Court Ordered Plaintiffs to show cause as to why this action

22

should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute based on their failure to respond to

23

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 24.) Plaintiffs

24

were ordered to file a response by July 29, 2013 and were warned that failure to do so could

25

result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

26

Procedure 41(b). To date, Plaintiffs have not responded to the Court’s Order.

27
28

Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for August 8, 2013 on Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is hereby VACATED and this action is
DISMISSED for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b).

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

Dated: August 2, 2013
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2