Perry et al v. Fantasy Records et al

Filing 35

ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE 32 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/11/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/17/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP DANIEL B. ASIMOW (No. 165661) daniel.asimow@aporter.com CSABA RUSZNAK (No. 283768) csaba.rusznak@aporter.com Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 Attorneys for Defendant FANTASY RECORDS SAUL ZAENTZ COMPANY PAUL ZAENTZ 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARNEY PERRY and PERRYAL MUSIC COMPANY, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 15 16 FANTASY RECORDS, SAUL ZAENTZ COMPANY and PAUL ZAENTZ, Case No.: 13-cv-01158 NC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS FANTASY RECORDS, SAUL ZAENTZ COMPANY, AND PAUL ZAENTZ’S EX PARTE MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION TO CMC AND ASSOC. DEADLINES 13-cv-01158 NC 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: the Case Management Conference in this case is continued until September 11, 2013, and all other associated deadlines are continued accordingly. 5 S UNIT ED 7 8 RT U O 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA DERED SO OR IT IS Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins Dated: ____________________, 2013 May 17 R NIA 3 Conference and Associated Deadlines, and good cause appearing: United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court for thes Northern District of California ael M. Cousin an 9 NO 10 RT 11 Judge Na ER 13 A H 12 th FO 2 The Court, having considered Defendants’ Ex Parte Motion to Continue Case Management LI 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION TO CMC AND ASSOC. DEADLINES 13-cv-01158 NC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?