Perry et al v. Fantasy Records et al
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE 32 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/11/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/17/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
DANIEL B. ASIMOW (No. 165661)
daniel.asimow@aporter.com
CSABA RUSZNAK (No. 283768)
csaba.rusznak@aporter.com
Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Attorneys for Defendant
FANTASY RECORDS
SAUL ZAENTZ COMPANY
PAUL ZAENTZ
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BARNEY PERRY and PERRYAL MUSIC
COMPANY,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
vs.
14
15
16
FANTASY RECORDS, SAUL ZAENTZ
COMPANY and PAUL ZAENTZ,
Case No.: 13-cv-01158 NC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS FANTASY RECORDS,
SAUL ZAENTZ COMPANY, AND PAUL
ZAENTZ’S EX PARTE MOTION TO
CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED
DEADLINES
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION TO CMC AND ASSOC. DEADLINES 13-cv-01158 NC
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: the Case Management Conference in this case is continued
until September 11, 2013, and all other associated deadlines are continued accordingly.
5
S
UNIT
ED
7
8
RT
U
O
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
DERED
SO OR
IT IS
Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins
Dated: ____________________, 2013
May 17
R NIA
3
Conference and Associated Deadlines, and good cause appearing:
United States Magistrate Judge
United States District Court for thes Northern
District of California ael M. Cousin
an
9
NO
10
RT
11
Judge Na
ER
13
A
H
12
th
FO
2
The Court, having considered Defendants’ Ex Parte Motion to Continue Case Management
LI
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION TO CMC AND ASSOC. DEADLINES 13-cv-01158 NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?