Sargent v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A et al
Filing
16
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/31/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CARYL A. SARGENT,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
12
No. C 13-01690 WHA
v.
13
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al.,
14
ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RE DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendants.
/
15
16
On May 9, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3,
17
plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto was due by May 27. None was
18
received. On May 29, the action was reassigned to the undersigned judge. Defendant has
19
renoticed the motion for hearing on July 11. Accordingly, the following briefing schedule is
20
hereby set: plaintiff’s response to the motion to dismiss is due by NOON ON JUNE 13. The reply
21
is due NOON ON JUNE 20.
22
For the benefit of plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, the parties are on notice that failure
23
to timely respond to the motion to dismiss may result in the motion being granted or the action
24
being dismissed for failure to prosecute.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 31, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?