Sargent v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A et al

Filing 16

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/31/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CARYL A. SARGENT,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

12

No. C 13-01690 WHA

v.

13

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al.,

14

ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RE DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants.
/

15
16

On May 9, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3,

17

plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto was due by May 27. None was

18

received. On May 29, the action was reassigned to the undersigned judge. Defendant has

19

renoticed the motion for hearing on July 11. Accordingly, the following briefing schedule is

20

hereby set: plaintiff’s response to the motion to dismiss is due by NOON ON JUNE 13. The reply

21

is due NOON ON JUNE 20.

22

For the benefit of plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, the parties are on notice that failure

23

to timely respond to the motion to dismiss may result in the motion being granted or the action

24

being dismissed for failure to prosecute.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 31, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE