Sargent v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A et al

Filing 20

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 7/1/2013.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/17/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
CARYL A. SARGENT,

10

Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

9

No. C 13-01690 WHA

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

12

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al.,

13

Defendants.
/

14
15

On May 9, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. As plaintiff failed to timely file a

16

response, an order issued setting a briefing schedule pursuant to which plaintiff’s response was

17

due by JUNE 13. The order further stated that failure to timely respond to the motion to dismiss

18

may result in the motion being granted or the action being dismissed for failure to prosecute.

19

Plaintiff’s deadline for filing a response has come and gone and no response has been received.

20

Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause why the motion to dismiss should

21

not be granted. Plaintiff is hereby warned a second time that failure to timely respond to this

22

order may result in the motion to dismiss being granted or the action being dismissed for failure

23

to prosecute. Plaintiff’s response is due by NOON ON JULY 1. Defendant’s reply brief, if any, is

24

due by NOON ON JULY 8. The hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss is hereby reset for JULY

25

18.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: June 17, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE