Highgrade Tech. Co., Ltd. v. OSD Audio et al
Filing
80
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR HAYDEN LY TO FILE ANY OPPOSITION TO DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 77 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Hayden Ly filed by Highgrade Tech. Co., Ltd. Response due by 8/29/2014. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 22, 2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
HIGHGRADE TECH. CO., LTD.,
Case No. 13-cv-01881-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
HAYDEN LY,
Defendant.
Re: ECF No. 77
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR
HAYDEN LY TO FILE ANY
OPPOSITION TO DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
12
13
Plaintiff Highgrade Technology Co. Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) has moved to dismiss this action
14
against pro se Defendant Hayden Ly, stating that Highgrade “no longer desires to prosecute its
15
claims against Defendant Hayden Ly.” ECF No. 77. Plaintiff has proposed that dismissal be
16
“without prejudice,” which means that Plaintiff would not be legally prohibited from deciding to
17
bring this action against Defendant Ly at a later time. If Defendant Hayden Ly has any response
18
or opposition to Plaintiff’s motion, he must ensure that his response is received by this Court no
19
later than August 29. Defendant Ly may also file a stipulation, or non-opposition, to the motion.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 22, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?