Highgrade Tech. Co., Ltd. v. OSD Audio et al

Filing 80

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR HAYDEN LY TO FILE ANY OPPOSITION TO DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 77 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Hayden Ly filed by Highgrade Tech. Co., Ltd. Response due by 8/29/2014. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 22, 2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HIGHGRADE TECH. CO., LTD., Case No. 13-cv-01881-JST Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 HAYDEN LY, Defendant. Re: ECF No. 77 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR HAYDEN LY TO FILE ANY OPPOSITION TO DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12 13 Plaintiff Highgrade Technology Co. Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) has moved to dismiss this action 14 against pro se Defendant Hayden Ly, stating that Highgrade “no longer desires to prosecute its 15 claims against Defendant Hayden Ly.” ECF No. 77. Plaintiff has proposed that dismissal be 16 “without prejudice,” which means that Plaintiff would not be legally prohibited from deciding to 17 bring this action against Defendant Ly at a later time. If Defendant Hayden Ly has any response 18 or opposition to Plaintiff’s motion, he must ensure that his response is received by this Court no 19 later than August 29. Defendant Ly may also file a stipulation, or non-opposition, to the motion. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 22, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?