Gibbs v. Chisman et al
Filing
14
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND RE-SERVING DEFENDANT CHISMAN. Dispositive Motion due by 3/17/2014. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/13/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2014)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
Plaintiff,
7
8
No. C-13-2488 TEH (PR)
KENNETH B. GIBBS,
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR ENTRY
OF DEFAULT AND RE-SERVING
DEFENDANT CHISMAN
v.
R. CHISMAN, et al.,
(Doc. ##12, 13)
9
Defendants.
/
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
Plaintiff Kenneth Gibbs, a former inmate at Pelican Bay
12
13
State Prison (PBSP), filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.
14
§ 1983 alleging constitutional violations against PBSP Correctional
15
Officers R. Chisman and J. Juneau.
16
issued an Order of Partial Service, finding that Plaintiff had
17
stated a cognizable claim against Officer Chisman but had not stated
18
a cognizable claim against Officer Juneau.
19
dismissed the claim against Officer Juneau with leave to file a
20
First Amended Complaint (FAC) for Plaintiff to remedy the
21
deficiencies noted by the Court.
22
dismissed the claim against Officer Juneau, finding that Plaintiff
23
had not stated a cognizable claim against Officer Juneau in his FAC.
24
On July 8, 2013, the Court
Doc. #7.
The Court
On August 21, 2013, the Court
On December 10, 2013, Plaintiff filed a declaration for
25
entry of default against Officer Chisman because the time for her to
26
answer the complaint and file a dispositive motion had passed.
27
#12.
28
Chisman was returned unexecuted with a remark by the Marshal that it
Doc.
However, on December 12, 2013, the summons as to Officer
1
was “returned unexecuted and process was not served through
2
administrative error–-request resubmission for service.”
3
4
Doc. #13.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for entry of default is
denied and Defendant Chisman will be re-served.
5
For the foregoing reasons, the Court orders as follows:
6
1. The request for entry of default is denied.
7
2.
Doc. #12.
The Clerk shall issue summons and the United States
8
Marshal shall serve, without prepayment of fees, copies of the
9
complaint, doc. #4, the FAC, doc. #9, and all attachments thereto,
10
and copies of the Order of Partial Service, doc. #7, the Order
11
Dismissing Claim Against Officer Juneau, doc. #10, and this Order on
12
Officer Chisman.
13
Plaintiff and mail a courtesy copy of this Order, the complaint and
14
FAC to the California Attorney General’s Office in San Francisco.
15
16
17
3.
The Clerk shall also mail a copy of this Order to
To expedite the resolution of this case, the Court
orders as follows:
a.
No later than sixty-three (63) days from the
18
date of this order, Defendant shall file a motion for summary
19
judgment or other dispositive motion.
20
shall be supported by adequate factual documentation and shall
21
conform in all respects to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and
22
shall include as exhibits all records and incident reports stemming
23
from the events at issue.
24
required Ninth Circuit notice to Plaintiff for opposing dispositive
25
motions required by Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962–63 (9th Cir.
26
1998)(motion for summary judgment) and Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d
27
1108, 1120 n.14 (9th Cir. 2003) (motion to dismiss).
28
A motion for summary judgment
Defendant’s motion shall include the
2
See Woods v.
1
Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 935 (9th Cir. 2012) (notice requirements set
2
out in Rand must be served concurrently with the motion); Stratton
3
v. Terhune, 697 F.3d 1004, 1008 (9th Cir. 2012) (notice requirement
4
set out in Wyatt must be served concurrently with motion to dismiss
5
for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies).
6
Defendant is of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by
7
summary judgment or other dispositive motion, she shall so inform
8
the Court prior to the date her motion is due.
9
with the Court shall be served promptly on Plaintiff.
10
b.
If
All papers filed
Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion
11
shall be filed with the Court and served upon Defendant no later
12
than thirty-five (35) days after Defendant serves Plaintiff with the
13
motion.
14
c.
Plaintiff is advised that a motion for summary
15
judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will,
16
if granted, end your case.
17
order to oppose a motion for summary judgment.
18
judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material
19
fact - that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that
20
would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for
21
summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which
22
will end your case.
23
summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or
24
other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your amended
25
complaint says.
26
declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or
27
authenticated documents, as provided in Rule 56(c), that contradict
28
Rule 56 tells you what you must do in
Generally, summary
When a party you are suing makes a motion for
Instead, you must set out specific facts in
3
1
the facts shown in Defendant’s declarations and documents and show
2
that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial.
3
not submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if
4
appropriate, may be entered against you.
5
granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial.
6
Rand, 154 F.3d at 962–63.
7
If you do
If summary judgment is
Plaintiff also is advised that a motion to dismiss for
8
failure to exhaust administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C.
9
§ 1997e(a) will, if granted, end your case, albeit without
10
prejudice.
11
opposition in order to dispute any “factual record” presented by the
12
Defendants in their motion to dismiss.
13
n.14.
14
did exhaust your available administrative remedies before coming to
15
federal court.
16
are statements signed under penalty of perjury by you or others who
17
have personal knowledge of relevant matters; (2) authenticated
18
documents – documents accompanied by a declaration showing where
19
they came from and why they are authentic, or other sworn papers
20
such as answers to interrogatories or depositions; (3) statements in
21
your complaint insofar as they were made under penalty of perjury
22
and they show that you have personal knowledge of the matters stated
23
therein.
24
the Court can decide disputed issues of fact with regard to this
25
portion of the case.
26
27
28
You must “develop a record” and present it in your
Wyatt, 315 F.3d at 1120
You have the right to present any evidence to show that you
Such evidence may include: (1) declarations, which
In considering a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust,
Stratton, 697 F.3d at 1008-09.
(The Rand and Wyatt/Stratton notices above do not excuse
Defendant’s obligation to serve said notices again concurrently with
4
1
motions to dismiss for failure to exhaust available administrative
2
remedies and motions for summary judgment.
3
d.
Woods, 684 F.3d at 935.)
Defendant shall file a reply brief within
4
fourteen (14) days of the date on which Plaintiff serves her with
5
the opposition.
6
e.
The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the
7
date the reply brief is due.
8
unless the Court so orders at a later date.
9
4.
No hearing will be held on the motion
Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal
10
Rules of Civil Procedure.
11
the parties may conduct discovery.
12
5.
No further court order is required before
All communications by Plaintiff with the Court must be
13
served on Defendant, or Defendant’s counsel once counsel has been
14
designated, by mailing a true copy of the document to Defendants or
15
Defendants’ counsel.
16
6.
It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this
17
case.
18
change of address and must comply with the Court’s orders in a
19
timely fashion.
20
this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
21
Plaintiff must keep the Court and all parties informed of any
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
DATED
01/13/2014
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?