Public.Resource.org v. United States Internal Revenue Service

Filing 49

Declaration of Beth Simone Noveck in Support of 47 MOTION for Summary Judgment Plaintiff Public.Resource.Org's Consolidated Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed byPublic.Resource.org. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) 47 ) (Burke, Thomas) (Filed on 9/29/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 10 11 12 13 14 15 THOMAS R. BURKE (CA State Bar No. 141930) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 276-6500 Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 Email: thomasburke@dwt.com RONALD G. LONDON (Pro Hac Vice) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 1919 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 800 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 973-4200 Email: ronnielondon@dwt.com DAN LAIDMAN (State Bar No. 274482) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90017-2566 Telephone: (213) 633-6800 Facsimile: (213) 633-6899 Email: danlaidman@dwt.com DAVID HALPERIN (Pro Hac Vice) 1530 P Street NW Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 905-3434 Email: davidhalperindc@gmail.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Public.Resource.Org 16 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG., a California non- ) Case No. 3:13-CV-02789-WHO profit organization, ) ) Plaintiff, ) DECLARATION OF BETH SIMONE ) NOVECK v. ) ) UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE ) SERVICE, ) ) Defendant. ) 27 28 1 Declaration of Beth Simone Noveck DWT 24853710v1 0200593-000001 1 I, Beth Simone Noveck, declare as follows: 2 1. Since 2002, I have been a Professor of Law at the New York Law School. I am 3 presently on leave from that position. I have personal knowledge of the matters stated in this 4 declaration and could competently testify to them if called as a witness. 5 2. I am currently the Jerry Hultin Global Network Visiting Professor of Engineering 6 at New York University and since 2012, I have also been a Visiting Professor at the MIT Media 7 Lab. 8 9 3. From 2009 to 2011, I served as United States Deputy Chief Technology Officer in the Executive Office of the President. In that capacity, I was charged with responsibility for the DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 10 White House Open Government Initiative, including implementation of the President's 11 Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government and the Office of Management and 12 Budget's Open Government Directive and, together with my colleagues, implementation of the 13 Administration’s policy on open government data. 14 4. As a result of this policy millions of people have searched for and downloaded 15 open government datasets about everything from air pollution to farmers’ markets to government 16 spending. Today, the governments of over 40 countries have opened more than a million data 17 sets. People outside of government are using this data to develop solutions to challenging 18 problems. For example, governments around the world are opening up the data they collect, such 19 as subway and bus schedules, and then inviting tech-savvy citizens — civic coders — to create 20 smartphone apps that tell commuters when their bus or train is coming. 21 5. In 2013, I served as co-author and principal investigator of the report "Information 22 for Impact: Liberating Nonprofit Sector Data" published by the Aspen Institute (Aspen Institute 23 Report). This report was an independent examination of Internal Revenue Service distribution of 24 Exempt Organization tax returns (Forms 990). Preparation for the Aspen Institute Report included 25 extensive interviews and discussions with experts in the field, including GuideStar, the National 26 Center for Charitable Statistics at the Urban Institute, the Foundation Center, the Center on 27 Philanthropy at Indiana University, and the Center for Civil Society Studies at Johns Hopkins 28 University. A copy of this report can be found at 2 Declaration of Beth Simone Noveck DWT 24853710v1 0200593-000001 1 http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/psi/psi_Information-for-Impact.pdf 2 and is appended to this Declaration at Exhibit A. 3 6. The conclusion of the Aspen Institute Report was the data that the IRS collects 4 about nonprofit organizations present a great opportunity to learn about and make the nonprofit 5 sector more innovative and effective. Yet this data could be made far more useful than it is today 6 if it were provided in open formats, by which I mean that the Forms 990 should be accessible in 7 forms that third parties can use to do analysis and develop software applications about the 8 workings of America’s nonprofits. 9 7. One of the primary conclusions of the Aspen Institute Report was that the IRS DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 10 should make the Forms 990 available in the format in which they were created. In other words, the 11 990s in Modernized e-File Format (MeF) should be published as-is in an open, digital format 12 rather than being converted at time and taxpayer expense into the low-resolution images that are 13 currently distributed. 14 8. The current system for distribution of e-filed Forms 990 consists of combining the 15 e-file data with the forms and releasing the information as an image file. The result is the 16 equivalent of a scanned paper document. Taking this extra step of converting open, digital data 17 into an image file, instead of releasing the data received in MeF format in which it was filed, 18 makes the information significantly harder to use. While techniques such as Optical Character 19 Recognition (OCR) could be employed to recognize some of the data, these techniques are prone 20 to considerable numbers of errors and are significantly more difficult than working with the data 21 in the original MeF format. 22 9. Making data in MeF format could enable researchers and law enforcement to 23 recognize fraud early, anticipate abuses, and target enforcement more efficiently and effectively. 24 For example, many state Attorneys General have a policy of providing extra scrutiny for 25 nonprofits that provide loans to directors or officers. While such loans are not per se wrong, they 26 are often a red flag that signals the presence of possible governance issues. Under the current 27 system for release of the Form 990, state enforcement officials are forced to manually leaf through 28 3 Declaration of Beth Simone Noveck DWT 24853710v1 0200593-000001 1 large numbers of returns, whereas with release of data in MeF format, a simple computer program 2 could find that information easily. 3 10. If data in MeF format were available, for example, information from the Form 990 4 could be more easily combined with other datasets, such as those on government spending, to 5 better understand the relationship between public and private dollars in providing social services. 6 11. If data in MeF format were available, extensive, in-depth, empirical research on the 7 sector as a whole, including sector-wide issues such as the impact of the economic downturn on 8 nonprofits, the geographic distribution of nonprofit services, and the efficiency of the nonprofit 9 sector in delivering services could be conducted more easily. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 10 12. On January 31, 2013, I spoke publicly on a panel at the Aspen Institute where 11 representatives of major foundations and other leaders of the nonprofit community strongly 12 indicated that they would welcome the release of electronic Forms 990. A video of that panel is 13 available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6ZhoIjvt2o 14 13. As I wrote in a public letter published in Forbes to IRS Acting Commissioner 15 Werfel, if data in MeF format were available, the IRS itself could more cost-effectively spot 16 patterns of fraud and abuse and conduct its own enforcement activities on the basis of tangible and 17 visible evidence. That article can be found at: “IRS: Turn Over a New Leaf, Open Up Data,” a 18 Forbes (May 2013). 19 14. Federal policy is very clear that making information available in machine- 20 processable format, such as the Modernized e-File Format (MEF), is an important public interest 21 goal as explained in the Executive Order "Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default 22 for Government Information." That Executive Order can be found at 23 http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/09/executive-order-making-open-and- 24 machine-readable-new-default-government- That Executive Order states "To promote continued 25 job growth, Government efficiency, and the social good that can be gained from opening 26 Government data to the public, the default state of new and modernized Government information 27 resources shall be open and machine readable." 28 4 Declaration of Beth Simone Noveck DWT 24853710v1 0200593-000001 1 15. I believe that release of Forms 990 as machine-processable data in MeF format 2 would be of immense use to those that work with Exempt Organizations data and would open up a 3 raft of new uses for those that have been unable to work with the data because of the current, 4 outmoded distribution format. I believe release of data in MeF format is clearly in the public 5 interest. 6 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 7 true and correct and that this declaration was executed this 23rd day of September, 2014 at New York, 8 N. Y. 9 /s/ Beth Simone Noveck BETH SIMONE NOVECK DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 Declaration of Beth Simone Noveck DWT 24853710v1 0200593-000001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?