Heatherly et al v. KRB Group Inc et al

Filing 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiffs to show cause by 8/22/2014, why their case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Defendants must file a consent or declination by 8/22/2014. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/8/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Consent/Declination)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 DAREN HEATHERLY; and IRMA 11 RAMIREZ, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 Case No. 13-cv-03396 NC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 14 KRB GROUP, INC., a California Corporation dba VILLAGE MARKET; and ROBERT 15 F.G. TOY and BEVERLY G. TOY, Trustees of the TOY FAMILY REVOCABLE 16 TRUST, U/A/D 7/13/91, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiffs filed this action on July 22, 2013, alleging violations of the Americans with 20 21 Disabilities Act. Dkt. No. 1. A joint inspection of premises was to occur by November 4, 22 2013. Dkt. No. 3. On April 3, 2014, the Court extended this deadline to April 30, 2014, at 23 the parties’ stipulated request. Dkt. No. 11. Forty-two days after the joint inspection, June 24 11, 2014, was the last day for plaintiffs to file a notice of need for mediation. Dkt. No. 3. 25 Plaintiffs have not done so, and therefore must show cause by August 22, 2014, why their 26 case should not be dismissed for a failure to prosecute. 27 // 28 Case No. 13-cv-03396 NC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 1 Additionally, by August 22, 2014, defendants must file a consent or declination to , t r n m udge. 2 proceed before a magistrate ju 3 IT IS SO OR T RDERED. 4 Date: Augus 8, 2014 st 5 ____ __________ __________ _____ Nath hanael M. C Cousins Unit States M ted Magistrate J Judge 6 7 8 9 10 0 11 1 12 2 13 3 14 4 15 5 16 6 17 7 18 8 19 9 20 0 21 1 22 2 23 3 24 4 25 5 26 6 27 7 28 8 Case No. 13-cv-0339 NC 96 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE R 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?