Buck v. Brower et al

Filing 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Plaintiff shall file opposition (or statement of nonopposition) and show cause why action should not be dismissed by 10/11/2013. Plaintiff shall also file consent/declination by 10/11/2013. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/1/13. (Attachments: # 1 Consent / Declination, # 2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 LARRY BUCK, 12 13 Case No. 13-cv-04084 NC Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 14 KIM BROWER, JAMES ROHDE and 15 16 DEBBIE GAYNOR, Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 On September 11, 2013, defendants Kim Brower, James Rohde, and Debbie Gaynor filed a motion to dismiss pro se plaintiff Larry Buck’s complaint. Dkt. No. 4. Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) requires parties to file and serve an opposition within fourteen days after a motion is filed. In the alternative, a party who does not oppose the motion must file a statement of nonopposition with the Court within fourteen days. Civ. L.R. 7-3(b). Where, as in this case, the motion was not served through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system, see Dkt. No. 4-3, these deadlines are extended by 3 days. Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). Accordingly, Buck’s response to defendants’ motion was due by September 30, 2013. Buck has not filed a response. “Failure to follow a district court’s local rules is a proper ground for dismissal.” Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, 28 Case No. 13-cv-04084 NC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as ober ose nts’ n s 1 Buck ha until Octo 11, 2013, to oppo defendan motion to dismiss (or file a nt pposition) an to show cause why this action should not be dismiss nd t sed. 2 statemen of nonop f espond will result in di ismissal of t case wi prejudic this ith ce. 3 Buck’s failure to re 4 Buck must also consent or decline the jurisdic B a t e ction of a m magistrate ju udge by Oc ctober 3. ched consen nt/declinatio forms. on 5 11, 2013 See attac 6 IT IS SO OR T RDERED. 7 Date: Octobe 1, 2013 er 8 ____ __________ __________ _____ Nath hanael M. C Cousins Unit States M ted Magistrate J Judge 9 10 0 11 1 12 2 13 3 14 4 15 5 16 6 17 7 18 8 19 9 20 0 21 1 22 2 23 3 24 4 25 5 26 6 27 7 28 8 Case No. 13-cv-0408 NC 84 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE R 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?