Prado v. Quality Loan Service Corporation et al

Filing 18

ORDER Granting 17 Plaintiff's Request for Continuance.Plaintiff shall file Responses to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss by 12/16/2013. Defendants' shall file Replies by 12/23/2013. Motion Hearing 9 14 CONTINUED to 1/23/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/18/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

NORMA PRADO,

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C-13-4536 EMC

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE

QUALITY LOAN SERVICE
CORPORATION, et al.,

(Docket No. 17)

12
Defendants.
13
___________________________________/
14
15

Plaintiff Norma Prado, proceeding pro se, has filed a motion asking that the hearing on two

16

motions to dismiss, currently scheduled for December 12, 2013, be vacated and continued to January

17

23, 2014. Ms. Prado seeks this relief on the basis that she needs additional “time to prepare and file

18

documents because [of] unforeseen, unscheduled travel outside the country.” Mot. at 17.

19

Defendants Aurora Loan Services, LLC and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC have opposed the request.1

20

Aurora and Nationstar state that they are not adverse to giving Ms. Prado additional time to submit

21

oppositions to the motions (the time for filing oppositions has now passed) but argue that the hearing

22

date should be maintained.

23

Having considered the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS the request for relief.

24

While the Court is not unsympathetic to Aurora and Nationstar’s position, a brief delay of six weeks

25

will not unduly prejudice them. Accordingly, the Court hereby orders as follows.

26
27
28

1

Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation has not weighed in on the matter.

1

Ms. Prado shall file her oppositions to the two motions to dismiss (Aurora/Nationstar’s

2

motion and Quality Loan’s motion) by December 16, 2013. Aurora/Nationstar and Quality Loan

3

shall then have until December 23, 2013, to file their reply briefs. The hearing on the motions shall

4

be continued to January 23, 2014, at 1:30 p.m.

5

This order disposes of Docket No. 17.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated: November 18, 2013
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2