Horstman v. Tate et al

Filing 12

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 1/27/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2014)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7

JEFFERY PAUL HORSTMAN,

United States District Court
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California California
For the Northern District of

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

9
10

No. C 13-4561 NC (PR)

Plaintiff,

8

HAROLD TATE, et al.,
Defendants.

11

/

12
13

On October 23, 2013, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint

14

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 6, 2013, the Court dismissed the complaint

15

with leave to amend, explaining the deficiencies in the complaint that needed to be cured.

16

The Court directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. Plaintiff was

17

cautioned that his failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this action. More than

18

sixty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise

19

communicated with the Court.

20
21

Accordingly, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is
directed to enter judgment and close the file.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:

January 27, 2014
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge