Goodfellow v. Ahren et al
ORDER CLARIFYING PRIOR ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/12/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2014)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 13-04726 RS
ORDER CLARIFYING PRIOR ORDER
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
GREGORY AHREN, et al.,
As indicated in recent filings, the ASCO defendants appear to be operating under the
misconception that plaintiff Goodfellow’s § 1983 claims against Sherriff Ahern and Deputy Willis
were dismissed without leave to amend. As explained in the prior order, defendants’ Rule 12
motions were “denied in part and granted in part with leave to amend.” (Order on Defendants’
Motions, ECF No. 43, 17:4-5). The order further explains that Goodfellow’s defective claims could
be dismissed with prejudice if he fails sufficiently to amend his complaint. No claim was dismissed
without leave to amend.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?