Goodfellow v. Ahren et al

Filing 56

ORDER CLARIFYING PRIOR ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/12/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 13-04726 RS

JAMES GOODFELLOW,
Plaintiff,

ORDER CLARIFYING PRIOR ORDER
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

v.

13
14

GREGORY AHREN, et al.,

15

Defendants.
____________________________________/

16
17

As indicated in recent filings, the ASCO defendants appear to be operating under the

18

misconception that plaintiff Goodfellow’s § 1983 claims against Sherriff Ahern and Deputy Willis

19

were dismissed without leave to amend. As explained in the prior order, defendants’ Rule 12

20

motions were “denied in part and granted in part with leave to amend.” (Order on Defendants’

21

Motions, ECF No. 43, 17:4-5). The order further explains that Goodfellow’s defective claims could

22

be dismissed with prejudice if he fails sufficiently to amend his complaint. No claim was dismissed

23

without leave to amend.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: 5/12/14

27
28

RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE