Newson v. United Parcel Service
Filing
26
ORDER appointing counsel. Harmeet K. Dhillon & John-Paul S. Deol; Dhillon & Smith LLP, 177 Post Street, Suite 700, San Francisco, CA 94108, Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 4/28/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/28/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tfS, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAMAR NEWSON,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Defendant(s).
)
)
) Case Number: 13-5199 SI
)
) ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
)
)
)
)
Because the plaintiff has requested and is in need of counsel to assist him in this matter and
a volunteer attorney is willing to be appointed to undertake this representation at the request of the
Federal Pro Bono Project, Harmeet K. Dhillon and John-Paul S. Deol are hereby appointed as
counsel for Lamar Newson in this matter.
The scope of this referral shall be for:
all purposes for the duration of the case
the limited purpose of representing the litigant in the course of
mediation
early neutral evaluation
settlement conference
briefing
and hearing on the following motion (e.g., motion for
summary judgment or motion to dismiss):
__________________________________________________________
discovery as follows:
__________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
other:
__________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed until four weeks from the date of this
order. Counsel shall be familiar with General Order No. 25 and the Federal Pro Bono Project
Guidelines posted on the Court’s website.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 4/28/14
United States District Judge
EXHIBIT D TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT GUIDELINES
EXHIBIT D TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT GUIDELINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?