Stowers v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 37

ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/28/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

8

12
13
14
15
16

ALLEN STOWERS,

No. : 3:13-CV-05426-RS

Plaintiff,
ORDER

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/

17
18

This case was closed when judgment was entered in favor of all defendants and against

19

plaintiff Allen Stowers on April 28, 2014. (ECF No. 34). On May 16, 2014, nearly three weeks

20

after his case was terminated, Mr. Stowers lodged an amended complaint. (ECF No. 36). The

21

amended complaint explains that, due to his eviction, Mr. Stowers did not receive notice of the

22

court’s prior order allowing him thirty days to amend his deficient complaint. (See Order Granting

23

Motion to Dismiss with Leave to Amend, March 25, 2014, ECF No. 31).

24

Because this case is already closed, Mr. Stowers is hereby advised that no further action will

25

be taken on his amended complaint. This does not preclude his filing an appeal with the United

26

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Indeed, Mr. Stowers already lodged a notice of

27

appeal and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (See ECF Nos. 33 and 34). The

28

1

latter request was granted on April 28, 2014. (ECF No. 35). If Mr. Stowers wishes to litigate the

2

merits of his case any further, he must do so on appeal.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: 5/28/14

7

RICHARD SEEBORG

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2