Torbov v. Cenlar Agency, Inc
Filing
22
ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/28/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
TSVETAN TORBOV,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
v.
No. C 14-0130 RS
ORDER VACATING HEARING AND
DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
REPLY
CENLAR AGENCY, INC.,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
19
A temporary restraining order (“TRO”) previously issued in this matter and a preliminary
20
injunction hearing was set for March 6, 2014. Defendant has now opposed entry of a preliminary
21
injunction, contending that plaintiff has not even alleged, and cannot demonstrate, any facts
22
showing a fraud or a breach of contract, and therefore cannot establish the requisite likelihood of
23
success on the merits.
24
Defendant argues and offers evidence that it acted within its rights to declare plaintiff in
25
default on his loan obligation and thereafter to refuse to accept partial payments. Although the
26
complaint and TRO application were construed with great liberality for purposes of ruling on the
27
TRO, plaintiff has presented few facts or evidence in support of his claims. Plaintiff is directed to
28
file any reply to defendant’s opposition no later than March 6, 2014. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule
1
No. C 14-0130 RS
ORDER
1
7-1(b), the matter will then be taken under submission without oral argument. Accordingly, the
2
hearing set for that date is hereby vacated.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: 2/28/14
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
No. C 14-0130 RS
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?