Weaver v. First Watch, PBSP
Filing
7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/13/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2014)
1
*E-Filed 6/13/14*
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
WILLIE WEAVER,
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
13
14
No. C 14-0453 RS (PR)
CAPTAIN, et al.,
Defendants.
15
/
16
INTRODUCTION
17
This is a federal civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a pro se state
18
19
prisoner against his jailors at Pelican Bay State Prison. The original complaint was
20
dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff’s amended complaint fails to
21
correct the deficiencies of the first, and is DISMISSED without prejudice.
DISCUSSION
22
23
24
A.
Standard of Review
A “complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim
25
to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009)
26
(quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). “A claim has facial
27
plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the
28
No. C 14-0453 RS (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. (quoting
2
Twombly, 550 U.S. at 556). Furthermore, a court “is not required to accept legal conclusions
3
cast in the form of factual allegations if those conclusions cannot reasonably be drawn from
4
the facts alleged.” Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network, 18 F.3d 752, 754–55 (9th Cir. 1994).
5
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements:
6
that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and
7
that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of state law. See
8
West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).
9
B.
(1)
(2)
Legal Claims
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Plaintiff alleges in his amended complaint that he is awakened at night by “bad air”
11
coming through the vents that is causing him to cough. He asserts that he filed complaints
12
with prison officials regarding this state of affairs. These allegations do not contain
13
sufficient factual matter to state a claim for relief. First, he fails to allege specific facts
14
indicating that a prison official knows that a prisoner faces a substantial risk of serious harm
15
and disregards that risk by failing to take reasonable steps to abate it. Allegations of “bad
16
air” and coughing do not indicate that defendants knew that plaintiff faced a substantial risk
17
of serious harm and disregarded that risk. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U. S. 825, 837
18
(1994). Second, naming First Watch as defendants does not show that these defendants were
19
responsible for or caused the bad air.
20
Accordingly, this civil rights action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff may
21
move to reopen the action. Any such motion must contain an amended complaint addressing
22
and curing the serious deficiencies described in this order. The Clerk shall enter judgment in
23
favor of defendants, and close the file.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
DATED: June 13, 2014
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
26
27
28
No. C 14-0453 RS (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?