Starski v. Board for Correction of Naval Records
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMITTING DEFENDANT TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/13/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2014)
1 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
2 ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
3 ABRAHAM A. SIMMONS (CABN 146400)
Assistant United States Attorney
4
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
5
Telephone: (415) 436-7264
FAX: (415) 436-7234
6
Abraham.Simmons@usdoj.gov
7
Attorneys for Federal Defendant
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 EDWARD STARSKI,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14 BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C 14-0650
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND
PERMITTING DEFENDANT TO FILE
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD UNDER SEAL
STIPULATION
The parties hereby agree and stipulate that the clerks default entered in this matter on
May 21, 2014 shall be set aside. The parties further agree and stipulate that the administrative
record being reviewed in this matter shall be filed under seal.
21
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
22
23
24
_/s/ Edward Starski___
Edward Starski
_/s/ Abraham Simmons_________
ABRAHAM A. SIMMONS
Assistant United States Attorney
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
It is so ORDERED. The May 21, 2014 default is set aside. Defendant shall file the
administrative record under seal. Defendant shall file on the public record, redacted if
1
1 necessary, a copy of the final agency decision and any interim decisions being reviewed.
2
3
4
Dated: 6/13/14
_______________________________
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?