Starski v. Board for Correction of Naval Records

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMITTING DEFENDANT TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/13/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2014)

Download PDF
1 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney 2 ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348) Chief, Civil Division 3 ABRAHAM A. SIMMONS (CABN 146400) Assistant United States Attorney 4 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 5 Telephone: (415) 436-7264 FAX: (415) 436-7234 6 Abraham.Simmons@usdoj.gov 7 Attorneys for Federal Defendant 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD STARSKI, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. C 14-0650 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMITTING DEFENDANT TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD UNDER SEAL STIPULATION The parties hereby agree and stipulate that the clerks default entered in this matter on May 21, 2014 shall be set aside. The parties further agree and stipulate that the administrative record being reviewed in this matter shall be filed under seal. 21 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 22 23 24 _/s/ Edward Starski___ Edward Starski _/s/ Abraham Simmons_________ ABRAHAM A. SIMMONS Assistant United States Attorney 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER It is so ORDERED. The May 21, 2014 default is set aside. Defendant shall file the administrative record under seal. Defendant shall file on the public record, redacted if 1 1 necessary, a copy of the final agency decision and any interim decisions being reviewed. 2 3 4 Dated: 6/13/14 _______________________________ United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?