Weaver v. First Watch et al

Filing 6

ORDER REOPENING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/14/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2014)

1
2
3
4

*E-Filed 4/14/14*

5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

WILLIE WEAVER,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

No. C 14-0685 RS (PR)
ORDER REOPENING ACTION

v.
FIRST WATCH, et al.,
Defendants.
/

17
18

This civil rights action was dismissed because plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or

19

file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He has since filed a

20

complete IFP application, which the Court construes as containing a motion to reopen the

21

action. So construed, it is GRANTED. The action is REOPENED, and the Clerk is directed

22

to amend the docket accordingly. The judgment (Docket No. 4) and the order of dismissal

23

(Docket No. 3) are VACATED. At a later date, the Court will issue orders regarding the

24

claims set forth in the complaint and his IFP application.

25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 14, 2014
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

28
No. C 14-0685 RS (PR)
ORDER REOPENING ACTION