Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation et al
Filing
47
ORDER RE DISCOVERY STAY. Plaintiff's response due noon on May 21.. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 14, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/14/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE,
12
13
14
No. C 14-01279 WHA
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
v.
INTEL CORPORATION, et al.,
ORDER RE DISCOVERY STAY
Defendants.
/
15
16
In March 2014, pro se Michael A. Bruzzone commenced this action. In April 2013, this
17
action was reassigned to the undersigned judge. The initial case management conference and the
18
hearings on (1) the two motions to dismiss and (2) plaintiff’s “motion for time to corresspond
19
[sic] to Attorney General Eric Holder and President Obama” are set for June 19, 2014.
20
On May 13, defendant Intel Corporation filed a letter stating (Dkt. No. 44):
21
24
Intel respectfully requests that this Court stay all discovery and
initial disclosure obligations, unless and until such time as the
Court rules that Mr. Bruzzone can allege a claim that the Court has
jurisdiction to hear and decide. In the alternative, Intel respectfully
requests an expedited briefing and hearing schedule so that a
motion to stay can be heard before the May 29, 2014 deadline to
meet and confer regarding initial disclosures and a discovery plan.
25
Defendant ARM, Inc. joined the request (Dkt. No. 46). By NOON ON MAY 21, plaintiff may file
26
a response (NOT TO EXCEED THREE PAGES).
22
23
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 14, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?