Bey v. City Of Oakland et al

Filing 10

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John Muhammad Bey. Case Management Statement due by 10/30/2014. Initial Case Management Conference reset to 11/6/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 8/18/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 ALI SALEEM BEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants. 10 Case No. 14-cv-01626-JSC ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Plaintiffs Ali Saleem Bey and John Muhammad Bey filed this action without paying the 14 filing fee and without attorney representation in April 2014. Only Plaintiff Ali Bey, however, 15 made a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court granted Ali Bey’s motion, and ordered 16 John Muhammad Bey to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. John 17 Bey filed the motion on August 7, 2014. (Dkt. No. 9.) The Court has reviewed John Bey’s 18 motion and finds that he qualifies to proceed without paying the filing fee; accordingly, his motion 19 to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 20 The Court will now review the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915 to determine 21 if it should order the United States Marshal to effect service. The case management conference 22 scheduled for August 21, 2014 is therefore continued to November 6, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. 23 This Order disposes of Docket No. 9. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 18, 2014 ______________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?