Facebook, Inc., v. Grunin

Filing 73

REQUEST FOR BRIEFING. Brief due December 30 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 19, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/19/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 FACEBOOK, INC., 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, v. MARTIN GRUNIN, 12 REQUEST FOR BRIEFING Defendant. / 13 14 No. C 14-02323 WHA Facebook’s motion for default judgment against Martin Grunin, noticed for a hearing on 15 January 8, seeks default judgment on claims for breach of contract, fraud, violation of the 16 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. 1030(a)(2) and (a)(4), and California Penal Code 17 Section 502(c). By DECEMBER 30 AT NOON, Facebook shall please submit a brief addressing 18 the following questions: 19 1. Has any federal court found liability under Section 1030(a)(2), Section 20 1030(a)(4), and/or California Penal Code Section 502(c) based on the actions Mr. Grunin 21 allegedly took as pled in the operative complaint? For example, has any service-user (not an 22 employee or former employee) ever been found liable under these statutes (1) for accessing a 23 website, i.e., a social media website or search engine, after his/her access was revoked, or (2) for 24 impersonating others to obtain access to online services? Please also address all potentially 25 relevant decisions, including United States v. Nosal, 676 F.3d 854, 863 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc) 26 and LVRC Holdings LLC v. Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1134 (9th Cir. 2009). 27 28 2. Section 1030(a)(2) requires, among other items, that defendant “intentionally accesse[d] a computer” and “obtain[ed] information from any protected computer.” Where in the complaint did Facebook allege that Mr. Grunin accessed and obtained information from a 1 computer? It appears that Facebook alleged that Mr. Grunin accessed “Facebook’s proprietary 2 computers, computer systems, or computer networks” by obtaining “advertising accounts” and 3 running “deceptive ads” (Compl. ¶¶ 67, 73). Has any federal court ever found liability under 4 Section 1030(a) or California Penal Code Section 502(c) based on a service-user accessing a 5 server to obtain online services or user accounts, after his/her accounts had been revoked or 6 terminated? 7 8 9 Dated: December 19, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?