Facebook, Inc., v. Grunin
Filing
73
REQUEST FOR BRIEFING. Brief due December 30 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 19, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/19/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
FACEBOOK, INC.,
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
v.
MARTIN GRUNIN,
12
REQUEST FOR BRIEFING
Defendant.
/
13
14
No. C 14-02323 WHA
Facebook’s motion for default judgment against Martin Grunin, noticed for a hearing on
15
January 8, seeks default judgment on claims for breach of contract, fraud, violation of the
16
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. 1030(a)(2) and (a)(4), and California Penal Code
17
Section 502(c). By DECEMBER 30 AT NOON, Facebook shall please submit a brief addressing
18
the following questions:
19
1.
Has any federal court found liability under Section 1030(a)(2), Section
20
1030(a)(4), and/or California Penal Code Section 502(c) based on the actions Mr. Grunin
21
allegedly took as pled in the operative complaint? For example, has any service-user (not an
22
employee or former employee) ever been found liable under these statutes (1) for accessing a
23
website, i.e., a social media website or search engine, after his/her access was revoked, or (2) for
24
impersonating others to obtain access to online services? Please also address all potentially
25
relevant decisions, including United States v. Nosal, 676 F.3d 854, 863 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc)
26
and LVRC Holdings LLC v. Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1134 (9th Cir. 2009).
27
28
2.
Section 1030(a)(2) requires, among other items, that defendant “intentionally
accesse[d] a computer” and “obtain[ed] information from any protected computer.” Where in
the complaint did Facebook allege that Mr. Grunin accessed and obtained information from a
1
computer? It appears that Facebook alleged that Mr. Grunin accessed “Facebook’s proprietary
2
computers, computer systems, or computer networks” by obtaining “advertising accounts” and
3
running “deceptive ads” (Compl. ¶¶ 67, 73). Has any federal court ever found liability under
4
Section 1030(a) or California Penal Code Section 502(c) based on a service-user accessing a
5
server to obtain online services or user accounts, after his/her accounts had been revoked or
6
terminated?
7
8
9
Dated: December 19, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?