Lena v. San Quentin State Prison et al
Filing
8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND re 1 Complaint filed by Michael Angelo Lena. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/9/14. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/9/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (lrcS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MICHAEL ANGELO LENA,
Case No. 14-cv-02498-JD
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE
TO AMEND
9
10
SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
13
14
He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
DISCUSSION
15
16
I.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
17
Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek
18
redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.
19
§ 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims
20
which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek
21
monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se
22
pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th
23
Cir. 1990).
24
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only “a short and plain statement of the
25
claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Although a complaint “does not need detailed
26
factual allegations, . . . a plaintiff’s obligation to provide the ‘grounds’ of his ‘entitle[ment] to
27
relief’ requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a
28
cause of action will not do. . . . Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above
1
the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (citations
2
omitted). A complaint must proffer “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its
3
face.” Id. at 570. The United States Supreme Court has explained the “plausible on its face”
4
standard of Twombly: “While legal conclusions can provide the framework of a complaint, they
5
must be supported by factual allegations. When there are well-pleaded factual allegations, a court
6
should assume their veracity and then determine whether they plausibly give rise to an entitlement
7
to relief.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009).
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that: (1) a right secured by
8
9
the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) the alleged deprivation was
committed by a person acting under the color of state law. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
II.
12
LEGAL CLAIMS
Plaintiff states that his legal materials have been confiscated by prison officials.
13
Allegations of destruction or confiscation of legal documents may state a claim for denial of
14
access to the courts. See Morello v. James, 810 F.2d 344, 346-348 (2d Cir. 1987). The state is
15
constitutionally required to provide affirmative assistance to pro se litigants, see Bounds v. Smith,
16
430 U.S. 817, 828 (1977), and cannot satisfy this obligation by providing a prisoner access to the
17
legal resources necessary to prepare his case and then deprive him of his work product, see
18
Morello v. James, 810 F.2d at 346-48. A plaintiff must allege an “actual injury” to court access,
19
however, which consists of a specific “instance in which an inmate was actually denied access to
20
the courts.” Sands v. Lewis, 886 F.2d 1166, 1171 (9th Cir. 1989). Only if an actual injury is
21
alleged does a plaintiff state a claim for which relief can be granted. See id.; see, e.g., Jenkins v.
22
McMickens, 618 F. Supp. 1472, 1474-75 (S.D.N.Y. 1985) (complaint alleging certain documents
23
pertaining to pending trial confiscated and not returned to conclusory to support claim of denial of
24
access to court).
25
Plaintiff states that defendants confiscated 23 boxes of his legal materials that contained
26
his appeal and trial evidence. However, plaintiff does not describe the specific legal materials that
27
were taken, how he was denied access to the courts and what legal injury he has suffered. The
28
complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend to provide additional information.
2
CONCLUSION
1
2
1.
The complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend. The amended complaint must
3
be filed within twenty-eight (28) days of the date this order is filed and must include the caption
4
and civil case number used in this order and the words AMENDED COMPLAINT on the first
5
page. Because an amended complaint completely replaces the original complaint, plaintiff must
6
include in it all the claims he wishes to present. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th
7
Cir. 1992). He may not incorporate material from the original complaint by reference. Failure to
8
amend within the designated time will result in the dismissal of this action.
9
02.
It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the
Court informed of any change of address by filing a separate paper with the clerk headed “Notice
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
of Change of Address,” and must comply with the Court’s orders in a timely fashion. Failure to
12
do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of
13
Civil Procedure 41(b).
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 9, 2014
______________________________________
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14-cv-02498-JD-_dwlta
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?