Young v. Third and Mission Associates LLC et al

Filing 5

ORDER RE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER re 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Fanya E Young Responses due by 8/18/2014 at noon. Motion Hearing set for 8/19/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 11, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/11/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 FANYA YOUNG, 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, No. C 14-03627 WHA v. 14 THIRD AND MISSION ASSOCIATES LLC; RELATED PROPERTY MANAGEMENT; RELATED CALIFORNIA; KIMBALL, TIRFY & ST. JOHN, LLP; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 12 13 ORDER RE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER / 16 17 Pro se plaintiff Fanya Young seeks a temporary restraining order enjoining the Sheriff’s 18 Department of the City and County of San Francisco from evicting her from an apartment. 19 One problem is that the lawsuit does not name the Sheriff’s Department as a party. Therefore, 20 there is no foundation for such an order. This order will, however, enjoin the named defendants 21 from seeking to evict plaintiff until a hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction, provided 22 that plaintiff posts a bond of the amount $5,000 and serves all defendants with the complaint, 23 summons, and all papers (including this order) by TUESDAY AUGUST 12 AT NOON. The hearing 24 on the motion for a preliminary injunction is hereby set for AUGUST 19 AT 10:30 A.M. 25 The opposition is due by AUGUST 18 AT NOON. No replies, please. The papers provided to the 26 Court were missing several pages. The copies served on all defendants must be complete. 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 11, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?