Elliott v. Roselin
Filing
9
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; and Adopting Report and Recommendation as to 6 . (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
VANCE S. ELLIOT,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-14-4026 EMC
DANIELLE ROSELIN,
12
Defendant.
___________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS; AND ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
(Docket Nos. 2, 6)
13
14
15
Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Vance S. Elliot’s application to proceed in
16
forma pauperis and Judge Westmore’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), which recommends
17
that Mr. Elliot’s claims be dismissed without leave to amend. Docket No. 6. On September 23,
18
2014, Mr. Elliot filed a declaration which this Court construes as an objection to the R&R. Docket
19
No. 8.
20
Having considered the papers submitted, the Report and Recommendation, and all other
21
evidence of record, the Court hereby GRANTS the application to proceed in forma pauperis, but
22
DISMISSES the Plaintiff’s claims without leave to amend. This Court agrees with Judge Westmore
23
that Mr. Elliot’s complaint of slander against an employee of the Department of Veteran Affairs,
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
premised on that employee’s description of Mr. Elliot as having a history of schizophrenia, is not
2
legally cognizable because the United States has not waived its sovereign immunity with respect to
3
claims for slander. See 28 U.S.C. 2680(h).
4
This order disposes of Docket Nos. 2 and 6.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: October 10, 2014
9
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?