Powers v. AT&T

Filing 59

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 12/22/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RICHARD B. POWERS, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 15-cv-01024-JSC ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL v. AT&T, et al., Defendants. 12 13 Because Plaintiff Richard B. Powers (“Plaintiff”) expressed a need for counsel to assist 14 him in this matter and a volunteer attorney is willing to be appointed to undertake this 15 representation at the request of the Federal Pro Bono Project, Howard Golds and Benjamin Lee of 16 Best Best & Krieger are appointed as counsel for Plaintiff in this matter. The Clerk shall amend 17 the docket to reflect their contact information as follows: Howard Golds, Best Best & Krieger, 18 3390 University Ave, 5th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501, and Benjamin Lee, Best Best & Krieger, 19 2001 North Main Street #390, Walnut Creek, CA 94596. 20 The scope of this referral shall be for the limited purpose of representing the litigant in the 21 course of a settlement conference. The Court will maintain the schedule set forth in its Order 22 granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss; however, should newly-appointed Plaintiff’s counsel 23 need more time for the settlement conference, the parties shall meet and confer to stipulate to a 24 new deadline for the settlement conference and a new case management conference date. 25 26 27 28 Counsel shall be familiar with General Order No. 25 and the Federal Pro Bono Project Guidelines posted on the Court’s website. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 22, 2015 1 ________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?