Anaya v. City and County of San Francisco Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 22

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/19/2015) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/19/2015: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tfS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

TAZMA DIWALI ANAYA,

Case No. 15-cv-02230-SI

Plaintiff,
8
v.

DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

9
10
11

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT,
et al.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 21

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13

Pro se plaintiff Tazma Diwali Anaya’s time to serve defendants with service of process

14

expired, after extension, on November 16, 2015. Since the Court granted plaintiff a 60-day

15

extension for service, plaintiff has filed two motions for an extension of time to amend her

16

complaint but has not served defendants. See Dkt. Nos. 18, 20, 21.

17

This Court has issued three orders reminding plaintiff of her obligation to serve defendants

18

with process, stating the deadline by which to do so, and notifying her that failure to serve

19

defendants could result in dismissal of the case without prejudice. See Dkt. Nos. 12, 15, 18. Two

20

of these orders have informed plaintiff of the availability of the Legal Help Desk, which could

21

advise plaintiff concerning how to accomplish service of process. See Dkt. Nos. 12, 18.

22
23

The Court declines to issue further extensions at this time. This action is DISMISSED
without prejudice for failure to effect service of process as ordered by the Court.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 19, 2015
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge