Hawkins v. S2Verify et al

Filing 124

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/16/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2) (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2017)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

REGMON L. HAWKINS, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
S2VERIFY, a foreign limited liability
company,
Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-03502 WHA
[PROPOSED] FINAL
JUDGMENT
Date:
Time:
Place: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor
Hon. William H. Alsup
CLASS ACTION
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
On May 5, 2017, the Court entered an Order granting final approval of the class action
settlement, and granting an award of attorneys’ fees, costs, class administration costs, and an
incentive award to lead plaintiff Regmon L. Hawkins (Dkt. 120).
The Court hereby orders that the claims of Plaintiff Regmon L. Hawkins in this case are
dismissed, with prejudice. This is a final judgment dismissing all pending claims in this lawsuit.
Hawkins and the other Class Members identified in the chart attached hereto as Exhibit 1 are bound
by all terms of the Amended Settlement Agreement and Release (Dkt. 102-1), including the release
of claims specified in Section 10.2, and by this Judgment.
The Court further orders that the persons identified in the chart attached as Exhibit 2 are
excluded from the Class. Nothing in the terms of the Settlement Agreement (including the release
of claims) shall apply to them.
The Clerk of the Court is ordered to enter this final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to all claims against Defendant S2Verify under 15 U.S.C. §§
1681c and 1681n of the FCRA.
Without in any way affecting the finality of this order and final judgment as to the Parties
with regard to the settled claims, the Court retains and reserves jurisdiction over the litigation and
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03502 WHA

1

the parties to the settlement to enter any future orders as may be necessary for the implementation,

2

enforcement, construction and interpretation of the Settlement Agreement as to the released

3

claims.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7

Dated: ______________
May 16, 2017.

By:

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03502 WHA

–2–

______________
Hon. William Alsup
United States District Judge