Del Conte et al v. The State of California et al

Filing 14

ORDER OF DISMISSAL - This federal civil rights action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to prosecute. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/01/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

CARLO ANTONIO DEL CONTE,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 15-cv-04077-WHO (PR)

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

v.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

12
13

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15
16

Plaintiff Del Conte has not filed an amended complaint by the deadline, which I

17

have extended twice: once on his motion, and once on my own. Dkt. Nos. 10 and 13. I

18

indicated in the last Order Extending Time that it was highly unlikely that I would allow a

19

further extension. Having received nothing from the plaintiff since then, this federal civil

20

rights action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P.

21

41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Del Conte may move to reopen the

22

action. Any such motion must contain an amended complaint that comports with the

23

requirements set forth in the Order Dismissing the Complaint with Leave to Amend

24

(Docket No. 7). The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 1, 2016
_________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge