Smith v. San Francisco Police Department

Filing 10

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/5/15. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2016)

1

*E-Filed 4/5/16*

2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

WAYNE SMITH,

11
12

No. C 15-4405 RS (PR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

13

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE
DEPARTMENT and
14 DEBORAH MADDEN,
15

Defendants.
/

16
17

Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order to file an amended complaint by

18

the deadline. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to respond

19

to the Court’s order, and for failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because this

20

dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any such motion

21

must contain an amended complaint compliant with the Court’s order dismissing the

22

complaint with leave to amend (Docket No. 7). The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of

23

defendants, and close the file.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

DATED: April 5, 2016
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

27
28
No. C 15-4405 RS (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL