Stevenson v. Jones
ORDER DENYING SECOND REQUEST TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT 46 46 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/25/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/25/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tfS, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHARLES L. STEVENSON,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 15-cv-05241-SI
ORDER DENYING SECOND REQUEST
TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 46
On May 30, 2017, the court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and
entered judgment against plaintiff. Plaintiff then filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment,
and the court denied the motion. Next, plaintiff filed a motion to amend his opposition to the
already-granted motion for summary judgment; the court denied that motion from plaintiff also.
Plaintiff now returns with a “motion to amend defendants summary of judgment/request
for counsel,” which the court construes to be another motion to alter or amend the judgment.
Docket No. 46. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED because he fails to show that the court committed
manifest error of law or fact, does not present new evidence; does not show that the summary
judgment decision was manifestly unjust; and does not show an intervening change in controlling
law. Insofar as plaintiff is requesting the appointment of counsel in this closed case, that request
also is denied. Plaintiff should not file any more motions attacking the judgment on the same
grounds he already has presented unsuccessfully.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 25, 2017
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?