Bonilla v. Attorney General of California

Filing 3

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 1/26/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Case No. 16-cv-00225-VC (PR) Plaintiff, 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE v. 7 8 9 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla is a state prisoner who alleges constitutional violations 12 against the Attorney General of California for committing “fraud on the court” in Bonilla’s state 13 habeas proceeding. Bonilla has been disqualified from proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 14 U.S.C. § 1915(g) unless he is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time he 15 filed his complaint. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g); In re Steven Bonilla, No. C 11-3180 CW (PR); Bonilla v. 16 Dawson, No. C 13-0951 CW (PR). 17 The allegations in this complaint do not show that Bonilla was in imminent danger at the 18 time of filing. Therefore, he may not proceed in forma pauperis. Furthermore, he may not 19 proceed even if he pays the filing fee because, even liberally construed, the allegations do not state 20 a claim for which relief may be granted and amendment would be futile. 21 Accordingly, this complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter 22 a separate judgment and close the file. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 26, 2016 ______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?