Whitworth v. United States Parole Commission et al

Filing 14

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. ADDRESSING 13 REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JERRY ALFRED WHITWORTH, 7 Case No. 16-cv-01469-HSG Plaintiff, 8 ORDER ADDRESSING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION v. 9 UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Re: Dkt. No. 13 12 On February 2, 2017, Petitioner filed a request for clarification.1 Final judgment in this 13 14 action was issued on August 19, 2016 (Dkt. No. 9) and the Court’s order denying reconsideration 15 was issued on December 1, 2016 (Dkt. No. 12). The Court’s direction to the Clerk of the Court in 16 the December 1, 2016 Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration to re-file Docket No. 1 as a 17 Section 2255 motion in Case No. CR 85-cr-0552-RS-1 did not re-open this case.2 This case is closed and no further filings will be accepted in this case. This order 18 19 terminates Dkt. No. 13. IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: 2/24/2017 ____________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 22 23 24 1 25 26 27 28 Petitioner states that if the Court’s December 1, 2016 order is a final judgment, he “give[s] notice of his intent to appeal.” Docket No. 13 at 2. If Petitioner wishes to file an appeal, he must file a notice of appeal that complies with the content requirements set forth in Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and file such notice within the time set forth in Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 2 Petitioner requests appointment of counsel and bail “[i]f other habeas corpus proceedings are required.” Docket No. 13 at 2. These requests should be made in the case in which his habeas corpus petition is pending, 85-cr-0552-RS-1.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?